I am currently running MS&S with the 8 bit with the GZ08. I would like to know how much better the resolution is with the 16 bit. I believe that a lot of my lack of finite fuel adjustment is due to the GZ08. Can anyone who previously ran the GZ08 and then upgraded tell me about the improvements.
Thanks
Resolution Question with MSII
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra or other non-B&G code configuration or tuning, please post them at http://www.msextra.com The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra or other non-B&G code configuration or tuning, please post them at http://www.msextra.com The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
-
Bernard Fife
- Super Squirter
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:15 pm
'I would like to know how much better the resolution is with the 16 bit.
kawizx12r,
It is much better. I have run both, and in multiple configuration (TBI, port, different sized injectors, etc.) on the same engine.
With MS-II I am able to run eight 72 lb/hr injectors on my engine with no practical restrictions on idle and cruise fuelling.
That wasn't possible with MS-I, and the fuelling had to be compromised to get an approximation of what the engine wanted. And even then the coarse increments in fuel PW as the inputs changed caused some tuning issues at small pulse widths.
So yes, it is better, and it's not just theoretical, it is something you can feel with large injectors on an application that requires a large dynamic range.
Lance.