Quick question about AFR table and EGO correction
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra or other non-B&G code configuration or tuning, please post them at http://www.msextra.com The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
Quick question about AFR table and EGO correction
I'm trying to wrap my head around the EGO correction, AFR tables and wideband 02 sensors (and autotune).
1. When using a wideband (just like a narrow band) MS is constantly trying to achieve stoich mixture, correct?
2. Unless you have an AFR table setup, then it tries to achieve whatever AFR ratio you've input into that table for that RPM and Kpa, correct?
3. If you turn on autotune then Megatune helps the MS out by adjusting the VE table so that the MS doesn't have to correct as much all the time, right?
Do I have all that right?
Thanks a bunch!
Fred
Re: Quick question about AFR table and EGO correction
Yes as long as you set NB mode - but then your sensor calibration will get screwed up so you don't want to do this. If you have WB and you want stoich everywhere, then fill the AFR table with 14.7.allen22 wrote:Hello,
I'm trying to wrap my head around the EGO correction, AFR tables and wideband 02 sensors (and autotune).
1. When using a wideband (just like a narrow band) MS is constantly trying to achieve stoich mixture, correct?
Yes2. Unless you have an AFR table setup, then it tries to achieve whatever AFR ratio you've input into that table for that RPM and Kpa, correct?
Yes.3. If you turn on autotune then Megatune helps the MS out by adjusting the VE table so that the MS doesn't have to correct as much all the time, right?
Do I have all that right?
Thanks a bunch!
Fred
-
dridders
- MegaSquirt Newbie
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:14 am
- Location: Nuremberg, Germany
- Contact:
1. So, the 02 reading is not really quick enough to depend on for real time engine management.
2. It's good for getting an AFR measurement then suggesting what to do about it next time your at that RPM and Kpa (not doing anything about it instantly unless your holding at that RPM and Kpa and have autotune turned on).
3. The VE table however is good for real time engine management because it's always there when the MS needs it, no slow sensor values to retrieve and compute, etc?
So then, if one had a good AFR table that was "perfect" and you used autotune for maybe a few weeks or so worth of driving (enough time to hit all RPM and Kpa cells long enough for autotune to do it's thing). Then, autotune would eventually "fix" your whole VE table and you could take out your 02 sensor completely, right? No need for EGO correction then.
But that all rides on having a very good AFR table.
thanks again,
Fred
-
Bernard Fife
- Super Squirter
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:15 pm
In addition to the transient and response time issues, there are a number of practical considerations for going to 'EGO only' control of fuelling.Why even have the VE table if you have a wideband?
Among these are:
- the sensor needs time to warm up from a cold start. Do you want to sit and wait 30 to 60 seconds while it does that (like a glow plug)?
- a sensor or sensor wiring failure would have no 'back-up' and the car would be undriveable. Other sensors can create problems too, but they aren't in a hot 800C exhaust stream.
- exhaust leaks or EGR problems could make the engine run badly or damage itself.
- rich mis-firing can indicate a lean condition to the sensor (excess oxygen), leading to an even richer mixture, and worse mis-firing, etc., in a run-away fashion.
- you would still have to tune the engine (to the optimal AFRs), so you wouldn't gain a lot in the process.
That's why MegaSquirt has limits on the EGO correction, and doesn't use EGO feedback under a number of conditions.
Lance.