inconsistency between silk screen and docs
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:20 pm
I just noticed that there are some inconsistencies between pin assignments on the silk screen on the microsquirt module (v2.2M) and the documention at http://www.microsquirt.info.
Printed on the module:
Pin31 - Serial Ground
Pin33 - Sensor Ground
Pin35..43,49 - Power Ground
Pin44,46 - IGN2 Out
Pin48,50 - IGN1 Out
In docs:
Pin31 - Sensor Ground
Pin33..43,49 - Power Ground
Pin44,46 - IGN1 Out
Pin48,50 - IGN2 Out
Which is correct?
Also, the pin assignments for Pins 45 and 47 were omitted. Are these also Power Grounds?
Edit: Also, are the coordinates depicted in the "Mounting Locations for Module" graphic correct (http://www.microsquirtmodule.com/indexright.html)? J1 Header appears to be higher (y) than specified. The weird thing is that I created a CAD part for this several months ago, and went back to double-check my work today. All of the x,y coordinates were different than the diagram. Was this diagram changed? I think that the old coordinates better reflect the actual layout of the board.
Printed on the module:
Pin31 - Serial Ground
Pin33 - Sensor Ground
Pin35..43,49 - Power Ground
Pin44,46 - IGN2 Out
Pin48,50 - IGN1 Out
In docs:
Pin31 - Sensor Ground
Pin33..43,49 - Power Ground
Pin44,46 - IGN1 Out
Pin48,50 - IGN2 Out
Which is correct?
Also, the pin assignments for Pins 45 and 47 were omitted. Are these also Power Grounds?
Edit: Also, are the coordinates depicted in the "Mounting Locations for Module" graphic correct (http://www.microsquirtmodule.com/indexright.html)? J1 Header appears to be higher (y) than specified. The weird thing is that I created a CAD part for this several months ago, and went back to double-check my work today. All of the x,y coordinates were different than the diagram. Was this diagram changed? I think that the old coordinates better reflect the actual layout of the board.