Map type- 250 and 115 kPa. How does it affect tuning?

For discussing MicroSquirt (TM) configuration and tuning of fuel parameters (including idle valves, etc.).
Forum rules
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra or other non-B&G code configuration or tuning, please post them at http://www.msextra.com The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
Post Reply
malloy1
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 8:45 am
Location: brighton colorado

Map type- 250 and 115 kPa. How does it affect tuning?

Post by malloy1 »

Just wondering how map type affects tuning?

I have 250kPa map type selected and MS tuned, but I get lousy gas mileage. I’m pretty sure I have a 250 kPa map, but just wondering if I’m wrong.

I got my MS finished up a couple of weeks ago, and been checking out the gas mileage, and after a couple of tank fill-ups, the gas mileage came out about 21 miles per gallon (and that's highway mileage (65-75mph)!-I drive 60 miles a day on a fairly flat, good flowing highway). I was hoping for more like 25-30 miles/gal. The car has plenty of power, but the gas mileage is awful.

The engine is a stock Volvo engine from a '79 Volvo 240 that I transplanted into a '65 Volvo 122.

The setup is:
-'65 Volvo 122 with a Volvo B21F engine/M41 transmission (stocked, not modified normally aspirated engine)
-LC-1 WBO2
-MS V2.2 running MSnS-extra (24s13) fuel only - tuning with MT2.25b514 and VEXME
-original '79 Bosch iginition setup from a 240
-Bosch 21lbs EFI injectors
-Volvo 850 Bosch TPS
-EGO crossover is set to 2.5v
-AFR is set to 14.7
-K&N air filter

I've checked the error on the odometer at around 3% fast, and the speedometer is around 5% slow. Which I find acceptable for a 40+ year old car.

I figured that a Volvo 122 total weight (a Volvo 122 total car weight is 2400 lbs vs a Volvo 240 total car weight 3000 lbs), running EFI, and a WBO2 sensor would produce better fuel economy than the original K-jet setup (The original Volvo 240 fuel setup gets about 25-28 mpg?)

Doesn't seem right that the stock setup gets about 30% better fuel economy than a MS setup? Especially since this is not a performance setup.

Could it be that I have the wrong setting selected for map type? The MS kit I purchased from Digikey in April 2004.

I just changed the map type setting from 250 to 115 kPa, and the car went from really rich at idle to really lean at idle (and died).


Paul
paul
Bernard Fife
Super Squirter
Posts: 1009
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:15 pm

Post by Bernard Fife »

Paul,

You have a 250 kPa MAP. All MegaSquirts (from B&G, some suppliers sell higher rated MAP sensors with their kits, I believe) have been this way for quite a while.

Have you tuned the VE table to maximize the fuel economy? There's more on that here: http://www.megasquirt.info/v22manual/mtune.htm#economy

Lance.
Post Reply