The MegaSquirt Project has experienced explosive growth other the years, with hundreds of new MS installations occurring every week - a phenomenal success! MegaSquirt has been successfully used in all aspects of Internal Combustion engine applications including R&D, Industry, Race, and Research. The MS project has transformed itself from a simple R&D project into a full-featured mature engine control system. To reflect this the support structure has also changed to meet the needs of MegaSquirt Users.
Moving forward, the R&D forums for MegaSquirt project are in a read-only mode - no new forum posts are accepted.
However the forums will remain available for view, they still contain a wealth of information on how MegaSquirt works, how it is installed and used. Feel free to search the forums for information, facts, and overview.While the R&D forum traffic has slowed in recent years, this is not at all a reflection of Megasquirt users, which continue to grow year after year. What has changed is that the method of MegaSquirt support today has rapidly moved to Facebook, this is where the vast majority of interaction is happening now. For those not on Facebook the msextra forums is another place for product support. Finally, for product selection assistance, all of the MegaSquirt vendors are there to help you select a system, along with all of the required pieces to make it complete.
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra or other non-B&G code configuration or tuning, please post them at http://www.msextra.com The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
Is there a relationship between Air fuel ratio (AFR) and pinging? I understand that higher compression engines combined with too advanced timing and too low octane fuel would be more prone to ping but can the AFR also contribute? If so, which way, richer = more ping or leaner = more ping
Kind regards
Philip
Land Rover Discovery '95 4.6 V8i MS-2/V3/2.36/LC-1/EDIS
Jaguar XJS V.12 5.3, MS-2(2.686t11 - Dual table)/Dual LC-1/MSD6A/spark(VR/dissy)+fuel(LoZ+PWM)
I believe if you run a richer mixture the engine is less likely to ping, up to a point. I`ve got detonation issues on boost, going to try a richer AFR (10:1) and see what happens. I think the extra fuel acts to cool the combustion chamber, heat is one of the causes of detonation.
keithmac wrote:I believe if you run a richer mixture the engine is less likely to ping, up to a point. I`ve got detonation issues on boost, going to try a richer AFR (10:1) and see what happens. I think the extra fuel acts to cool the combustion chamber, heat is one of the causes of detonation.
This is true-- and the extra fuel will also cause the combustion process to slow down a bit as the overly rich mixture won't burn as efficiently/fast.
I'd lean towards reducing your spark advance though rather than going overly rich to compensate for too much advance.
Plugs are 2 grades colder than stock, I`m out of ideas really. Going to 8:1CR when I change pistons, 9:1 at the mo. The VW 16v has a tendancy to ping at full load/ low rpm anyway so shoving 12psi through just exagerates the problem..
The lower compression should help alot then if that motor is known for ping issues.... Is it head design? Anything else that should be cleaned up while you're in there?