Control algorithm Alpha N / VE table does not follow TPS
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra or other non-B&G code configuration or tuning, please post them at http://www.msextra.com The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
Control algorithm Alpha N / VE table does not follow TPS
I have microsquirt v3 and code 3.78. I have set alpha n blending limit to 9000 rpm, so I suppose it should be pure Alpha N.
What is difference between these two Blend SD/Alpha N control algorithms (PW=--VE(tps,rpm)) and (PW=--f(tps)xVE(tps,rpm)) ?
I have chosen the first one.
Problem is following:
With engine off, the "dot" on ve-table follows TPS at "kpa" axis. With engine running, the dot is continuously at zero kpa. In ALPHA N map table the value changes.
What could cause this?
I recorded a video of the situation: http://youtu.be/23_UaIXskwoh
Thanks for advise.
Re: Control algorithm Alpha N / VE table does not follow TPS
Re: Control algorithm Alpha N / VE table does not follow TPS
- Attachments
-
- CurrentTune.msq
- (27.58 KiB) Downloaded 101 times
Re: Control algorithm Alpha N / VE table does not follow TPS
- Attachments
-
- 2012-02-16_14.38.14.msl
- (82.34 KiB) Downloaded 69 times
Re: Control algorithm Alpha N / VE table does not follow TPS
Maybe problem was related to MAP sampling settings, but I could not get it working with any values.
Re: Control algorithm Alpha N / VE table does not follow TPS
Vili wrote:Today I loaded the code "Monitor_v2.905.abs.s19" to the unit and everything I need is working.
Maybe problem was related to MAP sampling settings, but I could not get it working with any values.
That is quite possible since the code samples on time when there is no engine sync, but samples on crank angle when there is sync. Since you are not running in Dual Spark mode, there isn't much advantage to using the newer code.