should ve values be "smooth" ?

kev_rm · Post by **kev_rm** » Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:03 pm

I understand the values change based on the torque curve or efficiency of the motor at different ranges, but how much should they change bin to bin, say, given your MAP and RPM bins are linear.

keithmac · Post by **keithmac** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 2:39 am

It`s hard to put a number on it really, my VE table looks very random but the AFR`s are on the money for full load/ cruise/ idle etc so I don`t worry about it..

LT401Vette · Post by **LT401Vette** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:46 am

I making VE Analysis in MegaLogViewer, I have gone through processing of dozens of different MS setups, some end up with pretty smooth tables, others do have some high and low sections. But if your AFR is on, your good.

I have noticed that VE Anaysis does tend to make smoother tables than some other WB log processing. This is really because of the weighted- interpolated prediction model compared to closest cell hit.

So after a couple VE Analysis processing you will tend to get smoother ve tables, unless there is a real reason for the high point or valley.

bluetrepidation · Post by **bluetrepidation** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:34 pm

New ver of MegaLogViewer? NICE.